The petition seeks restraining orders from the top court against any potential arrest in undisclosed cases filed against him.


Islamabad: The wife of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) President Parvez Elahi on Saturday filed a petition with the Supreme Court (SC) challenging the Lahore High Court's (LHC) decision to dismiss a plea seeking her husband's release following his recent re-arrest.
The LHC had deemed the plea for the production and release of the PTI president as "infructuous" and subsequently disposed of it.
In her fresh petition to the apex court, Elahi's wife requested the release of her husband, arguing that the LHC did not thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding his arrest. The petition also sought restraining orders from the SC against any potential arrest in undisclosed cases filed against him.
Furthermore, she urged the top court to order Parvez Elahi's appearance in court. Despite the LHC's restraining order against his possible arrest, the PTI president was rearrested under the Maintenance of Public Order (3-MPO) by the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) police shortly after his release by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). Subsequently, the seasoned politician was placed under house arrest in Adiala jail for 15 days.
On September 5, the LHC issued a show-cause notice for contempt of court to Islamabad Inspector General (IG) Dr. Akbar Nasir Khan in connection with Parvez Elahi's detention under the 3-MPO. The LHC directed the Islamabad police chief to appear before the court on September 8.
Parvez Elahi later filed a petition with the LHC seeking contempt proceedings against the Islamabad IG. The LHC, in response, ordered the Islamabad IG to appear before the court regarding this matter on September 8.
In parallel developments, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) filed an appeal with the LHC regarding its restraining order against the possible arrest of Parvez Elahi in undisclosed cases.
NAB argued that the detention of the former Punjab chief minister was "legal," and he was under "remand."
NAB contended that the LHC single bench did not thoroughly examine the facts and requested the court to declare the single bench's verdict null and void. Besides it, NAB urged the LHC to suspend the single bench's order until the appeal's resolution.

How to be an AI minimalist
- 12 گھنٹے قبل

iPhone owners can now submit a claim in Apple’s $250 million Siri AI lawsuit
- 14 گھنٹے قبل

Pakistan downs eight drones launched from Afghan side: security sources
- 4 گھنٹے قبل

How violent West Bank settlers are threatening Israel’s alliance with America
- 12 گھنٹے قبل

Trump’s new press ban
- 3 گھنٹے قبل

Bungie says it’s ‘not done with Destiny’ and will bring back vaulted content
- 14 گھنٹے قبل

England fast bowler Wood retires from internationals after battling injuries
- ایک دن قبل

Pakistan Navy, Coast Guards thwart major smuggling attempt in Balochistan
- 5 گھنٹے قبل
Trump's Board of Peace to unveil $2.45bn Gaza recovery plan, reports
- ایک گھنٹہ قبل

Trump urges complete isolation of Iran, expects deal after election
- ایک دن قبل

GM can’t ‘bring back’ Apple CarPlay because it never left
- 14 گھنٹے قبل

The quiet campaign to stop Kamala 2028 is growing louder
- 12 گھنٹے قبل












