Hussain had pleaded not guilty to the charge filed under Section 1(2) of the Terrorism Act (TACT) 2006


A court in the United Kingdom Tuesday acquitted MQM supremo Altaf Hussain in encouraging terrorism case.
The MQM chief was not found guilty on two counts in the incitement to violence trial. A majority verdict of 10-2 was returned by jurors on the third day of deliberations.
The jury was directed to reach a majority decision after failing to reach a unanimous verdict. After nine hours, the jury found Hussain to be not guilty.
Hussain was charged with "encouraging terrorism" in an incendiary speech relayed from the United Kingdom to his followers in Pakistan on Aug 22, 2016.
He was arrested and released on bail before charges were filed in 2019, three years after Scotland Yard launched an investigation into speeches made in the UK that allegedly encouraged violence in Karachi.
Hussain had pleaded not guilty to the charge filed under Section 1(2) of the Terrorism Act (TACT) 2006.
The indictment had been split into two separate counts, both relating to the offence of “encouraging terrorism”, contrary to section 1(2) of the Terrorism Act 2006.
The charge as stated by the UK police was that Hussain had “on August 22, 2016 published a speech to crowds gathered in Karachi, Pakistan which were likely to be understood by some or all of the members of the public to whom they were published as a direct or indirect encouragement to them to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism and at the time he published them, intended them to be so encouraged, or was reckless as to whether they would be so encouraged”.
The Met Police at the time had also said: “Hussain was previously arrested on 11 June [2019] on suspicion of intentionally encouraging or assisting offences contrary to Section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007. He was released on bail and subsequently charged as above.”
Arguments in the case had concluded last week. Although it was initially expected that Hussain would take the stand, ultimately his counsel shared with the court that he decided against it.
Justice May had said that Hussain’s decision was his right and that the jury could conclude that he did not give evidence at trial to undermine and contradict his speeches.

Establishing Palestine with pre-1967 borders is bedrock of Pakistan's Middle East policy: PM
- 7 hours ago

You can still snag LG’s C4 OLED TV at half the price
- 8 hours ago

Google to invest $15bn in India
- 7 hours ago

Abhishek Bachchan first time wins Best Actor Filmfare Award in 25-year career
- 6 hours ago

We’re all about to be in wearable hell
- 8 hours ago

Punjab govt's important decision regarding toll plazas for public convenience
- 7 hours ago

OpenAI allegedly sent police to an AI regulation advocate’s door
- 8 hours ago

Azad Kashmir Information Minister Mazhar Saeed resigns
- 7 hours ago

Can America recover from Trump? Here’s what new data says.
- 6 hours ago

Apple’s executive reshuffling isn’t over
- 8 hours ago

Here’s how Apple is locking down iPhones to comply with Texas’ age verification law
- 8 hours ago

Once a club on the rise, Liverpool in desperate need of a spark under Gareth Taylor
- 5 hours ago