Heirs cannot force any person under the age of 18 to enter into a physical relationship agreement


Islamabad: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has given an important verdict about the wedding age that any marriage under the age of 18 is an illegal contract.
IHC Justice Babar Sattar has issued a written verdict and declared that a girl under the age of 18 cannot get married independently.
As per verdict, even the heirs cannot force any person under the age of 18 to enter into a physical relationship agreement. It also stated that age of puberty is biologically 18 years and physical changes before the age of 18 years are not legal puberty.
Justice Babar Sattar also directed in the verdict that the issue of non-clarification in the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance be placed before the Cabinet Division and the Parliament.
In the case of underage girl Sawera Falak Sher’s marriage, the court ordered Golra Police Station SHO to return her to her mother from Dar ul Amman (Shelter House).
A decision was taken on the petition of Mumtaz Bibi filed for the recovery of her daughter last year. Sawera had given a statement in the Court to marry voluntarily.

Meet the lawyer who beat Elon Musk — twice
- 9 hours ago
Heavy rain-lightning-flash floods kill two children, injure dozens in KP
- 19 hours ago

Leaked iPhone 18 Pro photos reportedly wound up on the dark web
- 9 hours ago

Why is everyone suddenly obsessed with toxins?
- 7 hours ago

The Flipper Zero creators’ Busy Bar productivity display will go on sale next month
- 9 hours ago

This could be our best look yet at Samsung’s new wide foldable
- 9 hours ago
Sargodha Police rule out two murder suspects in Muntaha Zahra case
- 15 hours ago

The unlikely cause bringing liberals and conservatives together
- 7 hours ago

Here’s a bunch of Prime Day deals on keyboards, mice, and other peripherals we like
- 9 hours ago

Nest’s quest to fix your thermostat
- 9 hours ago

Suno launches Spark incubator program to feed independent artists to its AI machine
- 9 hours ago

A fringe attack on voting rights just got four votes on the Supreme Court
- 7 hours ago

.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)







