The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution


Lahore: The move of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) to ban the court reporting was challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).
Samra Malik Advocate challenged the notification of PEMRA in the Lahore High Court.
The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
The petition requested that the court declare PEMRA's notification null and void and suspend the notification till the final decision of the petition.
It is pertinent to note that yesterday, journalistic organisations had rejected the notification of ban on judicial reporting by PEMRA. Journalist organisations Press Association of Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association rejected PEMRA's notification of ban on court reporting saying that PEMRA termed the notification against freedom of press and independent judiciary.
The released declaration further stated that the Constitution of Pakistan provides the right to freedom of expression and access to information and PEMRA does not have the power to ban the reporting of judicial proceedings. The notification is in flagrant violation of Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution and demanded that the notification banning judicial reporting be withdrawn. They said that PEMRA would be challenged in court if it did not withdraw the notification.
Two days ago, the PEMRA had banned the running of news or tickers related to pending court cases.
The PEMRA statement said that all news, current affairs and regional language TV channels should refrain from running tickers and news regarding pending court cases and also not report news of court written orders.
In this regard, it was further stated that no material based on any kind of comments, opinions or suggestions and recommendations should be broadcast regarding the possible outcome of the cases under hearing in the court, or tribunal.
However, the statement said that in such cases, the hearing of which is broadcast live, TV channels can report them.
Israel deports all foreign Gaza flotilla activists
- 5 hours ago

Pakistan condemns unlawful interception of Global Sumud Flotilla by Israeli forces
- 9 hours ago

Dyson’s super-slim PencilWash just hit its best price to date for Memorial Day
- 21 hours ago
President, PM reaffirm Pakistan’s commitment to strategic partnership with China
- 5 hours ago

Leaked images reveal Xbox Elite 3 controller
- 21 hours ago

MAGA’s favorite psychedelic
- 19 hours ago

This animal kills 100,000 people a year. Why can’t we stop it?
- 19 hours ago

Xbox fans want exclusives, more backward compatibility, and free online multiplayer
- 21 hours ago
Army officers, soldiers, martyrs honoured with military awards at GHQ ceremony
- 10 hours ago

Musk v. Altman proved that AI is led by the wrong people
- 21 hours ago

Microsoft starts canceling Claude Code licenses
- 21 hours ago

Apple’s accessibility features add more AI-powered processing
- 21 hours ago




