The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution


Lahore: The move of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) to ban the court reporting was challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).
Samra Malik Advocate challenged the notification of PEMRA in the Lahore High Court.
The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
The petition requested that the court declare PEMRA's notification null and void and suspend the notification till the final decision of the petition.
It is pertinent to note that yesterday, journalistic organisations had rejected the notification of ban on judicial reporting by PEMRA. Journalist organisations Press Association of Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association rejected PEMRA's notification of ban on court reporting saying that PEMRA termed the notification against freedom of press and independent judiciary.
The released declaration further stated that the Constitution of Pakistan provides the right to freedom of expression and access to information and PEMRA does not have the power to ban the reporting of judicial proceedings. The notification is in flagrant violation of Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution and demanded that the notification banning judicial reporting be withdrawn. They said that PEMRA would be challenged in court if it did not withdraw the notification.
Two days ago, the PEMRA had banned the running of news or tickers related to pending court cases.
The PEMRA statement said that all news, current affairs and regional language TV channels should refrain from running tickers and news regarding pending court cases and also not report news of court written orders.
In this regard, it was further stated that no material based on any kind of comments, opinions or suggestions and recommendations should be broadcast regarding the possible outcome of the cases under hearing in the court, or tribunal.
However, the statement said that in such cases, the hearing of which is broadcast live, TV channels can report them.

A crucial governor’s primary just became Democrats’ biggest debacle
- 2 hours ago

How to be a good roomie — regardless of where you are in life
- 2 hours ago

Did Trump just kill his own nuclear deal?
- 2 hours ago

PM, Field Marshal inaugurate Sky47 Karakorum-01 Data Centre
- 11 hours ago

It’s no longer illegal to destroy the one thing endangered species need most to survive
- 2 hours ago

Iran is showing it can still fight back
- 2 hours ago

Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one
- 4 hours ago
Alkhidmat sets up 46 emergency response centres nationwide ahead of flood threat
- 13 hours ago

The big healthcare fight Democrats keep dodging
- 2 hours ago

Tesla Robotaxis go to Florida
- 4 hours ago

Samsung Unpacked 2026: all the news from the July foldable launch
- 4 hours ago

The sci-fi movie that imagines AI isn’t so dystopian after all
- 4 hours ago




