The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution
Lahore: The move of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) to ban the court reporting was challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).
Samra Malik Advocate challenged the notification of PEMRA in the Lahore High Court.
The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
The petition requested that the court declare PEMRA's notification null and void and suspend the notification till the final decision of the petition.
It is pertinent to note that yesterday, journalistic organisations had rejected the notification of ban on judicial reporting by PEMRA. Journalist organisations Press Association of Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association rejected PEMRA's notification of ban on court reporting saying that PEMRA termed the notification against freedom of press and independent judiciary.
The released declaration further stated that the Constitution of Pakistan provides the right to freedom of expression and access to information and PEMRA does not have the power to ban the reporting of judicial proceedings. The notification is in flagrant violation of Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution and demanded that the notification banning judicial reporting be withdrawn. They said that PEMRA would be challenged in court if it did not withdraw the notification.
Two days ago, the PEMRA had banned the running of news or tickers related to pending court cases.
The PEMRA statement said that all news, current affairs and regional language TV channels should refrain from running tickers and news regarding pending court cases and also not report news of court written orders.
In this regard, it was further stated that no material based on any kind of comments, opinions or suggestions and recommendations should be broadcast regarding the possible outcome of the cases under hearing in the court, or tribunal.
However, the statement said that in such cases, the hearing of which is broadcast live, TV channels can report them.
Israeli continues attacking Gaza killing over 60 Palestinians
- 4 hours ago
Four killed, 11 injured in Sargodha car shooting
- a few seconds ago
UAE adds 19 individuals, entities to terrorist list
- 4 hours ago
Why everyone has a gnarly stomach bug right now, explained in one chart
- 5 hours ago
In May 9 case, rights were not suspended when accused were arrested: SC
- 2 hours ago
College athletes were ready to unionize before Trump’s election. What now?
- 5 hours ago
5,000 more pilgrims to perform Hajj under govt scheme
- 32 minutes ago
Sources: Alabama co-DC Hitschler will not return
- 6 hours ago
Pakistan responds to Afghanistan's claims of its nationals’ detention
- 3 hours ago
What banning medical debt from your credit score actually means
- 5 hours ago
Positive growth trajectory of Pakistan’s per capita GDP
- 3 hours ago
Sun shines in Lahore, fog intensity drops significantly
- 2 hours ago