The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution


Lahore: The move of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) to ban the court reporting was challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).
Samra Malik Advocate challenged the notification of PEMRA in the Lahore High Court.
The petitioner said that the notification issued by PEMRA on May 21 is illegal and violative of Article-19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
The petition requested that the court declare PEMRA's notification null and void and suspend the notification till the final decision of the petition.
It is pertinent to note that yesterday, journalistic organisations had rejected the notification of ban on judicial reporting by PEMRA. Journalist organisations Press Association of Supreme Court and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association rejected PEMRA's notification of ban on court reporting saying that PEMRA termed the notification against freedom of press and independent judiciary.
The released declaration further stated that the Constitution of Pakistan provides the right to freedom of expression and access to information and PEMRA does not have the power to ban the reporting of judicial proceedings. The notification is in flagrant violation of Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution and demanded that the notification banning judicial reporting be withdrawn. They said that PEMRA would be challenged in court if it did not withdraw the notification.
Two days ago, the PEMRA had banned the running of news or tickers related to pending court cases.
The PEMRA statement said that all news, current affairs and regional language TV channels should refrain from running tickers and news regarding pending court cases and also not report news of court written orders.
In this regard, it was further stated that no material based on any kind of comments, opinions or suggestions and recommendations should be broadcast regarding the possible outcome of the cases under hearing in the court, or tribunal.
However, the statement said that in such cases, the hearing of which is broadcast live, TV channels can report them.

Medvedev disqualified from China Open semi after hitting ball into crowd
- a day ago

Two Saudi airports targeted on Monday as fighting with Yemen's Houthis escalates
- 7 hours ago

The best early October Prime Day deals happening now
- 18 hours ago

Pakistan’s economy projected to grow 4pc this year: FinMin Aurangzeb
- 7 hours ago

US withdraws all bomber aircraft from UK airbase used during Iran war
- a day ago

OpenAI won’t go public until its models are safe
- 18 hours ago

What color is a tennis ball?
- 16 hours ago

Apple’s ‘HomePad’ will reportedly launch on October 13th
- 18 hours ago

Pakistan successfully test-launches Fatah-4 cruise missile
- 2 hours ago

The Sonos Ace Ultra are the headphones Sonos should have made the first time
- 18 hours ago

UN chief lauds Pakistan’s efforts to promote dialogue, mediation
- an hour ago

Djokovic wins China Open as de Minaur retires injured
- 5 hours ago






