"Supreme Court has already decided over allegations in the acquittal plea and later the accountability court also fulfilled legal merits while deciding the Avenfield case"


Islamabad: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) on Wednesday appealed to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) to reject the fresh application filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Vice President Maryam Nawaz for her acquittal in the Avenfield reference along with an exemplary fine, saying it was inadmissible for the hearing.
The NAB in its reply submitted before the IHC said that the acquittal plea filed by Maryam Nawaz is not fit for hearing and should be rejected with exemplary fines imposed against the petitioner.
“The Supreme Court of Pakistan has already decided over allegations in the acquittal plea and later the accountability court also fulfilled legal merits while deciding the Avenfield case,” it said.
In her reply submitted to the IHC, the bureau has contended that Maryam’s application is devoid of facts. “The Supreme Court (SC) has already given its judgment on the allegations levelled in her petition, and the accountability court had pronounced its verdict in the reference after completing all the legal formalities. Similarly, the defendant was given a patient hearing at the trial court as well,” the NAB writes in its reply.
The anti-corruption watchdog goes on to add that not only that Maryam’s father, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, and her two brothers, Hassan and Hussain Nawaz Sharif are also ‘proclaimed offenders’ since they have not given to the court the money trail of their London flats. “Will Nawaz Sharif please tell us how he purchased these flats and how did he send money to the UK for the purpose?” the NAB questions.
It is also mentioned in the reply that the SC had appointed a judge to see to it that its verdict in the Avenfield reference was implemented in letter and spirit.
Furthermore, the bureau argues that PML-N vice president’s plea for acquittal amounts to deceiving the IHC. “Maryam’s allegations against the judge, appointed as a ‘referee’ in the reference, fall in the category of contempt of court, and that the integrity of the judge could be ascertained from the fact that he is still a serving judge,” the NAB concludes.

Terrorist attacks in Balochistan: US, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Other countries strongly condemn
- 6 hours ago

Balochistan operations: 145 terrorists killed as CM vows long term fight against terrorism
- 2 hours ago
Sen. Cruz against college athletes as 'employees'
- 13 hours ago

With Bader in center field, Giants move Lee to rig...
- 2 hours ago

Security forces kill 133 terrorists in Balochistan operation, 15 soldiers martyred
- 6 hours ago

Windows 11’s ability to resume Android apps on your PC is getting closer
- 5 hours ago
Sumrall channels Meyer, makes Gators 'earn' logo
- 13 hours ago

Draymond: Not losing sleep as Giannis talk swirls
- 2 hours ago
Pavia vows to show NFL 'what I got' in Senior Bowl...
- 13 hours ago
Fiesta Bowl to host women's flag football tourney
- 13 hours ago

Interior minister,CM Balochistan and Corps Commander visit CMH Quetta
- 4 hours ago

Who will win the Australian Open men's title?
- 2 hours ago



