Connect with us

Pakistan

Tarar says any proposed legislation would be in collective interest of nation

Info Ministers says government would secure the necessary numbers in both HousesĀ 

Published by Samiullah Farid

Published

on

Islamabad: Information Minister Attaullah Tarar on Sunday dispelled concerns about any “person-specific” legislation, saying the government is committed to deliver speedy justice for the people of Pakistan.

While talking to media in Islamabad, Tarar stated, "Reforms are overdue to ensure that the people of Pakistan have access to swift justice," 

In response to a query, he maintained that the government would secure the necessary numbers in both Houses for the new legislation. "It is incorrect to believe that there is any person-specific legislation. Our focus is solely on the greater good of the masses," he reiterated.

Tarar stated that all political parties are united in their goal to provide speedy justice at the doorstep of the people. He also mentioned that a special committee, consisting of allied parties, is currently in session.

"Cabinet would convene shortly to discuss the matter," he maintained while giving the importance to these reforms.

Speaking to journalists, the minister assured that any proposed legislation would be in the collective interest of the nation.

He surther said that the judiciary has faced delays in resolving cases for many decades, making it imperative to implement measures for quicker justice.

Tarar highlighted that all coalition parties are represented on the special committee formed to address this issue. He also mentioned that Pakistan People’s Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar had discussed the Charter of Democracy as a framework for judicial reforms.

“Any amendment on matters of national concern should benefit the entire Pakistani nation,” he stated. He pointed out that legal gaps have often led to issues such as unissued cause lists, unserved notices, and delayed orders.

Continue Reading

Pakistan

Why is there such haste in presenting these amendments? : Maulana Haidri

JUI F leader expresses concerns on constitutional amendments

Published by Samiullah Farid

Published

on

Islamabad: JUI-F leader Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Haideri has expressed his concerns over government's proposed constitutional amendments, saying government has not yet provided us with the draft of the amendments.

Speaking to the media in Islamabad, Maulana Haideri emphasized, "We cannot make a decision on supporting the amendments until we have reviewed the draft."

He questioned the urgency with which the government is presenting these amendments, stating, "Why is there such haste in presenting these amendments?"

Haideri added that he will present his party stance in the meeting of parliamentary parties.

He asked, "The government should provide adequate time for us to read and consider the draft." 

He also warned that if the government proceeds hastily, "There is a possibility that our party may choose not to participate in the amendment process."

Continue Reading

Technology

JD Vance sells himself to Silicon Valley

JD Vanceā€™s appearance on the All-In podcast was useful for both him and his donor, David Sacks. Vance is selling his ticket, and Sacks is flexing his influence. Who benefits?

Published by Web Desk

Published

on

JD Vanceā€™s appearance at the All-In Summit was easily the most comfortable Iā€™ve seen him, but then he was with the people he understands best: other VCs.

The All-In podcast appearance was what business leaders refer to as a display of synergy. Cohost David Sacksā€™ and Vanceā€™s political fortunes are tied together ā€” if Trump wins, Sacks looks like a kingmaker and has a vice president who owes him favors and will take his calls. If Vance loses, remaining close to his real community ā€” venture capitalists ā€” gives him a valuable network to tap into for future campaigns.

ā€œDonald Trump cares more about the details of public policy than almost anyone Iā€™ve met in public life.ā€

Vance has called Sacks ā€œone of my closest confidants.ā€ (His other friends include Curtis Yarvin, an anti-democracy software developer, and VC Peter Thiel, about whom, more later.) Sacks has been shoring up influence in the Republican party, first with his flop attempt at coronating Ron DeSantis as the Republican nominee and now with Vance. Besides his fundraising activities, Sacksā€™ All-In podcast has also hosted Donald Trump and is a place Sacks routinely rants about his take on politics.Ā 

As far as I can tell, the purpose of Vanceā€™s appearance on All-In, which is also cohosted by fellow Trump supporter and Silicon Valley SPAC king Chamath Palihapitiya, was to explain away the anti-immigrant sentiment coming from the Republican party.

Vanceā€™s appearance was almost entirely disingenuous. According to Vance, anything bad you have heard about former President Donald Trump is because the lousy people in the American media have been busily lying about him. ā€œThe media doesnā€™t often tell you the truth about Donald Trump,ā€ Vance says. ā€œDonald Trump cares more about the details of public policy than almost anyone Iā€™ve met in public life.ā€ If you donā€™t believe him, Vance says, ā€œI just encourage you to listen to what he actually says.ā€

Yes, letā€™s. The same day the video of the All-In interview was uploaded to YouTube, Trump debated Vice President Kamala Harris. Asked why he had killed an immigration bill, Trump said the following, ā€œFirst, let me respond to the rallies. She said people start leaving. People donā€™t go to her rallies, thereā€™s no reason to go.ā€ He went on to discuss how he had ā€œthe biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics.ā€ Okay, but maybe Iā€™m cherry-picking! Letā€™s try another one. Asked if he had a plan for repealing Obamacare, Trump replied, ā€œI have concepts of a plan.ā€

Thiel characterized himself as ā€œpro-Trump, pro-JDā€

So much for Trumpā€™s grasp on public policy. As much fun as I am having quoting Trump, I am less interested in fisking Vanceā€™s appearance and more interested in what heā€™s doing on All-In in the first place.

Vance has played at being a man of the people, but he owes his place on Trumpā€™s ticket to Silicon Valleyā€™s billionaires. After all, he is a pet of Thiel, who put forward $15 million for Vanceā€™s Ohio Senate campaign. (There were other wealthy donors, too, including Oculus founder Palmer Luckey.) Thiel said he would sit out this race, but Vance has publicly said he is attempting to get Thiel ā€œoff the sidelinesā€ and donating into Trumpā€™s campaign.Ā (In his own All-In appearance, Thiel characterized himself as ā€œpro-Trump, pro-JDā€ and said that though he is not donating money, he is ā€œsupporting them in every other way possible.ā€)

In Thielā€™s absence, his fellow PayPal mafioso Sacks has aggressively moved into politics. Sacks hosted a $300,000-a-person dinner at his mansion to raise tech money for Donald Trump in July. That room wanted Vance for vice president, and it got him.

If you are wondering why Sacks, who is already rich, might be seeking more wealth and power, itā€™s worth remembering that VCsĀ are middlemen. They have to periodically raise money for their funds, and thatā€™s easier if they look knowledgeable, impressive, connected. Sacks has now hosted both the Republican presidential and vice presidential candidates on his show, and heā€™s quite cozy with Vance. These kinds of political ties might make fundraising easier or put him in the room with better founders. Even if Trump and Vance lose, heā€™s still made a powerful statement.

Halting immigration is key to the Trump campaign

Thatā€™s the ā€œconnectionsā€ side of this equation ā€” but Vanceā€™s real job was the ā€œknowledgeableā€ part. All-In is playing to people who consider themselves tech intelligentsia. They want one of their own to reassure them that despite Trumpā€™s tendency to blurt out nonsense about immigrants eating housepets, heā€™s a reasonable man like them. Claiming the media is unfairly biased against Trump is the kind of thing that plays in these rooms, where people already believe in an unfair media bias against tech CEOs.

More specifically, the real reason for Vanceā€™s appearance can be found near the middle of the podcast, when he began discussing immigration.

Silicon Valley is full of immigrants, from top (the current CEOs of Google, Microsoft, Adobe, and IBM) to bottom. Immigration is a crucial issue for this group of people. In 2016, when VC Marc Andreessen endorsed Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump, he said, ā€œThe Valley wouldnā€™t be here, we wouldnā€™t be doing any of this if we didnā€™t have the amazing flow of immigrants that weā€™ve had in the last 80 years. And the idea of choking that off just makes me sick to my stomach.ā€

Halting immigration is key to the Trump campaign, as evinced by signs reading ā€œMass Deportation Nowā€ that were held up during the Republican convention. In his previous term, Trump targeted the H-1B program, the visas that many tech workers use to come to the US. Andreessen appears to have settled his stomach about this, as he now endorses Trump and had nothing to say about immigration on his own podcast when he explained his decision. Vanceā€™s job was to reassure anyone who might still be feeling queasy.

Any immigrant should be paying attention to Trumpā€™s mass deportation plans

Vance started by making the Republicansā€™ anti-immigrant stance palatable to anyone who fears it might be bad for business. ā€œGenerally I agree, okay, weā€™re going to let some immigrants in,ā€ he says. ā€œWe want them to be high-talent, high quality people. You donā€™t want to let a large number of illegal aliens in.ā€

Per Vance, his ticket is about letting the right kind of immigrants in and keeping the wrong kind out. He reminded the crowd that he is married to ā€œthe daughter of legal immigrants to this country.ā€ Itā€™s just all the undocumented people that are screwing up America, he says. And all those bad immigrants are going to vote for Democrats. No, seriously, hereā€™s what Vance said:

When somebody like Chuck Schumer says, ā€œWell, you know, weā€™re going to have an emerging Democratic majority because weā€™re going to have all these new immigrants and all the old Americans, well, theyā€™re going to vote for Republicans, but weā€™re going to replace them with a bunch of new people who vote for Democrats,ā€ itā€™s like, thatā€™s pretty sick.

Vance awkwardly tried to downplay the calls for deportation. ā€œYou try to take it one step at a time,ā€ he says. ā€œBut the most important thing ā€”Ā and I think the deportations focus, again, it is important because weā€™re eventually, we are going to deport people ā€”Ā but the most important thing is to stop the bleeding.ā€

Any immigrant should be paying attention to Trumpā€™s mass deportation plans. Trump has said he wants to deport 15 to 20 million people; the logistics of this will likely be horrifying. People who are here legally may be picked up by accident and detained or deported. Itā€™s awfully convenient for Vance to show up and address an industry full of foreign workers, minimizingĀ the threat. There are shades of his mentor Thielā€™s famous comment from 2016:Ā  take Trump seriously, but not literally.

Weā€™ve actually had a Trump presidency since those comments, of course. And it suggests Trump should be taken both seriously and literally when he talks about choking off immigration. Itā€™s something heā€™s already done!Ā 

And when Vance says on All-In that he would not have certified the 2020 election ā€” ā€œI would have asked the states to submit alternative slates of electorsā€ are his words, echoing past remarks ā€” thatā€™s something I am inclined to take both seriously and literally, too. Vance is buddies with a monarchist; his mentor Thiel has written, ā€œI no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.ā€ His running mate has said, ā€œChristians, get out and vote, just this time. You wonā€™t have to do it anymore!ā€ Vance clearly believes in proximity to power. Iā€™m not sure he believes in much else, democracy included. And that seems to suit his Silicon Valley buddies just fine.

Comments
Continue Reading

Trending

Take a poll