Barely two weeks after initiating layoffs for at least 14,000 staffers, Tesla is now reportedly laying off hundreds more — including senior executives and the majority of its Supercharging team. 

According to an email first reported by The Information and then Electrek, the automaker’s senior director of EV charging Rebecca Tinucci is leaving the company on Tuesday, alongside most of the 500-person team she oversaw. Tesla’s head of the new vehicles program, Daniel Ho, is also out along with his team. These cuts come in addition to the recent 10 percent workforce reduction — and Musk’s email leaves room for more.

In the email sent to executives last night, Musk said he wants Tesla to be “absolutely hard core” about the cuts, and that staffers working under executives who “don’t obviously pass the excellent, necessary and trustworthy test” would also be out of a job. While the full scale of these new layoffs is unclear, Bloomberg previously reported that Tesla’s total headcount reduction that began earlier this month could end up being as high as 20 percent of its workforce, or well in excess of 20,000 employees.

Tinucci was notably responsible for the rollout of Tesla’s Supercharger network during her six years at the company, including efforts to get other companies to adopt the North American Charging Standard (NACS) developed by Tesla. In his email, Musk says Tesla will still build new Superchargers and complete those already under construction.

Others impacted by the new layoffs include Daniel Ho, a ten-year Tesla veteran who served as director of vehicle programs and new product initiatives, and as program manager for the Model S, 3, and Y vehicles. Most of the public policy team led by former head of policy and business development Rohan Patel (who left the company during the previous wave of layoffs) are also being let go.

These latest job cuts follow what’s already shaping up to be a terrible year for Tesla. The company’s stock price has taken a beating as profit margins sunk to six-year lows amid price reductions that came in response to increased competition and lower demand for EVs. It’s also dealing with a plethora of reputational issues impacting its brand — including never-ending investigations into its Autopilot feature, a recall of its Cybertruck, and Musk’s contentious behavior both online and in the courtroom.

Meta had its biggest lobbying quarter ever in the first few months of 2024, spending a record $7.6 million engaging with the US government, according to its public lobbying filing released last week.

It’s a 64 percent jump from its spending in the fourth quarter of 2023 and represents more than a third of what Meta spent on lobbying the entirety of last year. The blockbuster quarter underscores just how much pending legislation is aimed at Meta and its peers — on everything from data privacy, kids online safety, and content moderation.

Still, Meta says the sharp uptick is largely due to compensation for its lobbying team. “The increase in Meta’s lobbying expenditures is due principally to operating expenses, including changes to the timing of the biannual compensation structure and an elevated stock price,” Meta spokesperson Daniel Roberts said in a statement to The Verge.

Meta’s spending in the last quarter is an outlier among its big tech peers. It more than doubled the spend of Apple, Google, and Microsoft in the first quarter, which all spent closer to $2 or $3 million. Amazon spent the second most behind Meta at $4.4 million.

The most significant piece of tech legislation to pass recently was a bill that could ban TikTok unless its China-based parent company, ByteDance, divests it within a year — a law that Meta stands to directly benefit from if one of its closest competitors is forced to exit the US market. But Meta’s lobbying disclosure does not specifically list that bill as one it engaged on or the foreign aid package in which it passed. Meta’s Roberts confirmed the company did not lobby on the so-called Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act.

According to its Q1 disclosure, Meta lobbied on kids safety bills including the Kids Online Safety Act, Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and Protecting Kids on Social Media Act (which would impose age verification for social media). It also engaged on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reauthorization and bills related to tech’s legal liability shield known as Section 230. Some other topics included international data flows, encryption, subsea cables, taxes, and political ads.

Meta set its previous lobbying record in the fourth quarter of 2021, when it spent $5.4 million. That period coincided with the revelations from former employee turned whistleblower Frances Haugen, who shared internal documents showing the company was aware of the harmful effects of its services on teens, among other findings.