SC forms nine-member bench to hear cases against civilian trial in military courts
The apex court’s cause list shows the bench will take up the four petitions tomorrow (Thursday) at 11:45am.


Islamabad: The Supreme court of Pakistan on Wednesday formed a nine-member bench, led by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, to hear cases pertaining to the trials of civilians in military courts.
The bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising senior puisne judge Justice Qazi Faez Isa, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Mazahar Naqvi, and Justice Ayesha Malik would hear the pleas.
Earlier, prominent lawyer Aitzaz Ahsan, Justice Jawad S Khawaja, and others, represented by lawyer Salman Akram Raja, approached the Supreme Court on this matter.
Their plea sought the court's intervention to deem the trials of civilians in military courts as "unconstitutional," nullify sections 2 and 59 of the Army Act, and declare section 94 and related rules as unconstitutional.
Additionally, the petitioners requested the court to invalidate the Anti-Terrorism Court's decisions regarding the transfer of civilians to military courts and to order the release of civilians detained under army laws.
On May 9, protests broke out in different cities following the detention of the PTI chief from the Islamabad High Court in the Al Qadir Trust case. During the protests, social media platforms were inundated with videos showing rioting and vandalism at various locations, including the Lahore Corps Commander's residence.
In response to the incidents, the army labeled the day as a "dark chapter" and announced its intention to prosecute the rioters under relevant laws, including the Pakistan Army Act and Official Secrets Act, approximately a week later. The National Security Committee, the primary decision-making body on foreign policy and national security, endorsed this decision a day after its announcement.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif clarified that individuals accused of vandalizing civilian infrastructure would face trial under anti-terrorism laws, while those accused of damaging military property would be subject to military laws.
To date, anti-terrorism courts have granted permission for several suspects to be handed over to the military for trial in connection with the May 9 riots. These approvals have been granted on at least two occasions based on applications submitted by armed forces personnel.
Apple debuts passport-shaped foldable phone, called Duo
- 9 hours ago
Thieves steal Renoir paintings from French Riviera museum
- 18 hours ago

The mystery at the heart of Trump’s trade war
- 2 hours ago

The unusually muted Tesla Cybercab launch
- 19 hours ago

Your food may be safe. Its packaging is another story.
- 2 hours ago

The Jewish Democrats trying to get to “yes” on Abdul El-Sayed
- 17 hours ago

Eight Muslim countries welcome UK ban on goods from illegal Israeli settlements
- 9 hours ago

Why Iowa is a state to watch in the midterms
- 2 hours ago

Data centers can’t win on Earth. How about in space?
- 17 hours ago
Brent crude rises above $100 a barrel as Middle East conflict escalates
- 18 hours ago

Trump’s Smithsonian vendetta, briefly explained
- 2 hours ago

Security forces kill 11 terrorists in Kharan, Washuk: ISPR
- 18 hours ago







