He also stated that Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan had refused to sit in the bench and we added another senior judge at his place and delivered the verdict at 12 o'clock in the night.


Islamabad: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa Friday said that the election could have been derailed by a single decision of the Lahore High Court (LHC).
A full court meeting was held on the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, addressing which Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa stated that in his opinion, unnecessary objection was made to Justice Tariq in the intra-court appeals in the military courts.
The Chief Justice added: ‘Justice Sardar Tariq Masood had not given any opinion in his note on the issue of military courts, he had refused to sit in the bench on objection’.
Sardar Tariq Masood played a very important role in the Practice Procedure Committee. He used to say that 40 to 50 cases should be placed in his court. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood's court is famous for delivering more decisions, stated Qazi Faez.
The Chief Justice continued to say that Justice Tariq Masood also has a role in the background, he had the right to become the Chief Justice of LHC. By not appointing Justice Sardar Tariq the Chief Justice, the province suffered, however, Supreme Court benefited because he came here.
CJP Isa further said that the election could have been derailed by a decision of the LHC. ‘We sat and heard the case against this order at night before going for vacation. We then wanted to hear that case by forming a bench of three senior judges’.
He also stated that Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan had refused to sit in the bench and we added another senior judge at his place and delivered the verdict at 12 o'clock in the night. If this was not the case, the elections could have derailed from the date announced by President of Pakistan and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).
The Chief Justice further added that they are aware of the vacant posts of judges in the Supreme Court. The amendments in the rules regarding the appointment of judges are being considered. It is time to have a separate secretariat of the Judicial Commission for the appointment of judges.

Trump’s war on windmills, briefly explained
- 9 hours ago

The RAM shortage is here to stay, raising prices on PCs and phones
- 11 hours ago
Death anniversary of Malika-e-Tarannum Noor Jehan observed today
- 16 hours ago

Rad Power Bikes files for bankruptcy protection
- 11 hours ago
What makes the Great Smoky Mountains smoky?
- 9 hours ago
How Week 16 reset the race for the AFC and NFC 1-seeds: Barnwell on the NFL's best teams
- 10 hours ago

Netflix doesn’t stream its ‘Originals’ forever, here are some that may leave in 2026
- 11 hours ago
Women's AP Top 25 poll reaction: What to know about every team
- 10 hours ago

Bose’s first-gen QC Ultra headphones just hit their lowest price to date
- 11 hours ago

7 reasons to feel actually hopeful about the clean energy transition
- 14 minutes ago
The NHL's best this week: Is Craig Berube on the hot seat in Toronto?
- 10 hours ago
What did Cowboys get right in Schottenheimer's first season?
- 10 hours ago



