The domestic consumers, in AJK, pay between Rs3 to Rs6 per unit, while in other regions, the rates start at Rs6.72 and can go up to Rs35.26 per unit while users in AJK are charged Rs10 to Rs15 per unit, compared to Rs40.8 to Rs46.56 per unit elsewhere in Pakistan

Lahore: The IMF may express concerns to Pakistan over the Prime Minister’s recent announcement to provide relief to AJK residents by subsidizing their power tariffs, which are significantly lower than the rest of the country.
In AJK, domestic consumers pay between Rs3 to Rs6 per unit, while in other regions, the rates start at Rs6.72 and can go up to Rs35.26 per unit. Commercial users in AJK are charged Rs10 to Rs15 per unit, compared to Rs40.8 to Rs46.56 per unit elsewhere in Pakistan.
These substantial disparities are worrying. Economists suggest the Pakistani government should properly brief the IMF to avoid issues. Dr. Naved Hamid, Director at the Center for Research in Economics and Business (CREB), believes the IMF might accept this disparity if Pakistan meets its primary goal of preventing an increase in circular debt. This means consumers in Punjab may have to bear higher power tariffs to subsidize AJK, as other regions like KP and rural Sindh often default on power bills, and Karachi operates outside this system.
Dr. Nadia Tahir mentioned that the finance minister aims to reduce the fiscal deficit by 1.5 percent in the upcoming budget through strategies such as imposing a petroleum levy, expected to generate Rs1.1 trillion, and selling state-owned enterprises. She emphasized that the Prime Minister’s relief package of Rs23 billion (about $8.2 million) for AJK is manageable for the federal budget and represents overdue water usage payments from 2018.
In 2023, the government increased the average generation tariff from Rs4.96 per unit to Rs3.85 per unit. AJK residents demand their water use charges and refuse to pay for federal inefficiencies. The Neelum-Jhelum Hydropower Project, supplying 969 MW to the national grid since 2018, underlines AJK's claim to a share in net hydro profits. The regulator’s decision to increase AJK’s water usage charges to Rs5.44 billion from Rs712 million in FY22 supports this claim.
Dr. Qais Aslam noted that the IMF’s main demands are revenue targets and controlled circular debt. While AJK is technically not part of Pakistan, and Pakistan does not pay it for water usage that generates electricity, the country can justify reduced tariffs for AJK. However, Dr. Qais argues that this is politically unfair to Punjab, which bears the highest taxes and power tariffs, while other provinces have higher power theft rates and often criticize Punjab.
How the IMF will handle this issue remains to be seen, especially given their recent statement from Washington criticizing Pakistan for not meeting agreed conditions. Dr. Qais suggested a uniform tariff across the country to ensure fair treatment for all regions.

Is anyone going to stop a looming death spiral in Gaza?
- 3 hours ago

Pakistan veterans team advances into WCL final after Indian players forfeit semi-final
- 8 hours ago

They (finally) meet again: Three keys to Liberty-Lynx WNBA Finals rematch
- 4 hours ago

Pak Navy, US Navy conduct joint exercise in North Indian Ocean
- 8 hours ago
US, India launch powerful Earth-monitoring satellite
- 8 hours ago

What the right’s war on college is really about
- 3 hours ago

What a Black fascist can teach us about liberalism
- 3 hours ago

US imposes major sanctions on Iran's maritime infrastructure
- 8 minutes ago

What won’t Trump blame on California?
- 3 hours ago

Sony calls Tencent game ‘slavish clone’ of Horizon in new lawsuit
- 5 hours ago

President Trump announces trade deal with Pakistan, slams India with tariffs
- 8 hours ago

Mario Kart World and other Switch 2 games are 10 percent off
- 5 hours ago