Fire service official said there were no casualties in the fire, which was likely caused by an electric short circuit.


Dhaka: A huge fire gutted several hundreds of shops at a market in Bangladesh’s capital Dhaka, but there were no casualties as the blaze swept through the area in the early hours of Thursday, before stores opened.
It took six hours for military forces and firefighters to contain the blaze, which spread quickly in the Mohammadpur market due to the large amount of flammable items such as cooking oil and plastics, officials said.
Fire service official Shahjahan Sikder said there were no casualties in the fire, which was likely caused by an electric short circuit.
“My family was dependent on this shop, what to do now? All burnt to ashes,” a shop-owner told local media.
Fires are common in densely populated Dhaka, which has seen a building boom in recent years, often without proper safety measures. Fires and explosions often occur due to faulty gas cylinders, air conditioners and bad electrical wiring.
In April, a fire in a shopping complex in Dhaka injured several firefighters and burned down some 5,000 stores.
SOURCE: REUTERS

PM Shehbaz vows to pursue peace, dialogue and diplomacy for settlement of disputes
- 12 hours ago
Iran says it struck US-linked targets in response to US attacks
- 13 hours ago

How much do gold prices lose in value in Pakistan, global markets?
- 12 hours ago

Why this summer is the perfect time to start caring about sports
- a day ago
Small aircraft crashes into Beijing's tallest building, eyewitnesses say
- a day ago

Bullet-hit four bodies found inside ambulance in Bannu: police
- a day ago

5.9-magnitude earthquake rocks Punjab, Islamabad, parts of KP
- 9 hours ago

Magnitude 6.6 earthquake jolts southern Philippines, no tsunami alert raised
- a day ago
Belgium into World Cup last 32 with New Zealand rout
- 13 hours ago

Trump wants the US military to be rent-a-cops
- 13 hours ago

MSMEs take centre stage in govt’s economic vision, says SAPM Haroon Akhtar Khan
- 7 hours ago

The Supreme Court’s embarrassing new Second Amendment decision, explained
- a day ago







