Justice Musarat Hilali said that officer who conducts trial does not pronounce verdict in court himself


Islamabad: During the hearing of the case related to the trials of civilians in military courts in the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked that the trial procedure in military courts should be satisfied.
A seven-member constitutional bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan is hearing the case related to the trials of civilians in military courts. The bench includes Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.
The arguments of the Ministry of Defense’s lawyer Khawaja Haris are ongoing.
At the beginning of the hearing, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked that the trial procedure in military courts should be satisfied.
Justice Musarat Hilali said that the officer who conducts the trial does not pronounce the verdict in the court himself, but sends the case to another senior officer, who pronounces the verdict, how can an officer who has not heard the trial give a verdict?
Justice Jamal said: “I have been in this field for 34 years but still I do not consider myself complete. That army officer has so much experience and expertise that even death sentences are pronounced”.
Lawyer Khawaja Haris said that he would completely explain the procedure of military trial in the second part of the arguments.
Justice Naeem Akhtar asked everyone about the stages of how trials are being conducted in military courts. Everyone understands that military courts are not trialed like civilian courts, give an example of a trial in military courts.
There is a difference between the Army Act and the rest of the law. According to the constitution, it provides protection to all fundamental rights and a reasonable explanation has been given in the law, stated Justice Mandokhel.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar added that the procedure of court-martial is given. Justice Hassan Rizvi said that in field-martial there is a defense lawyer and there are no judges.
Trump concludes visit to China, says made 'fantastic trade deals' with Xi
- a day ago

Everything at The Criterion Collection is 30 percent off right now
- 10 hours ago
Aurangzeb terms Panda Bond issuance historic milestone
- 17 hours ago
Punjab relaxes business hour restriction of 8pm until June 1
- 18 hours ago

Pakistan repatriates its 11 nationals from US-seized vessels
- 17 hours ago

Why the anti-abortion movement is disappointed in Trump
- 8 hours ago
African nationals linked to Pinky’s drug network, her own brand name will be her downfall: Karachi police chief
- a day ago
Hantavirus outbreak tests post-Covid health communications playbook
- 18 hours ago
Security forces kill nine terrorists in attack on army camp in Bajur; four security personnel martyred: sources
- a day ago
What would J.R.R. Tolkien think of Palantir?
- 8 hours ago
Iran has 'no trust' in US, will negotiate only if it is serious, Araqchi says
- 21 hours ago

A year of Trump is backfiring on the religious right
- 8 hours ago






