Justice Musarat Hilali said that officer who conducts trial does not pronounce verdict in court himself


Islamabad: During the hearing of the case related to the trials of civilians in military courts in the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked that the trial procedure in military courts should be satisfied.
A seven-member constitutional bench headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan is hearing the case related to the trials of civilians in military courts. The bench includes Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.
The arguments of the Ministry of Defense’s lawyer Khawaja Haris are ongoing.
At the beginning of the hearing, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel remarked that the trial procedure in military courts should be satisfied.
Justice Musarat Hilali said that the officer who conducts the trial does not pronounce the verdict in the court himself, but sends the case to another senior officer, who pronounces the verdict, how can an officer who has not heard the trial give a verdict?
Justice Jamal said: “I have been in this field for 34 years but still I do not consider myself complete. That army officer has so much experience and expertise that even death sentences are pronounced”.
Lawyer Khawaja Haris said that he would completely explain the procedure of military trial in the second part of the arguments.
Justice Naeem Akhtar asked everyone about the stages of how trials are being conducted in military courts. Everyone understands that military courts are not trialed like civilian courts, give an example of a trial in military courts.
There is a difference between the Army Act and the rest of the law. According to the constitution, it provides protection to all fundamental rights and a reasonable explanation has been given in the law, stated Justice Mandokhel.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar added that the procedure of court-martial is given. Justice Hassan Rizvi said that in field-martial there is a defense lawyer and there are no judges.

Sources: No effects for LeBron after practices
- 6 گھنٹے قبل

Don't be surprised if ... Julius Randle leads the the Timberwolves in fantasy points
- 6 گھنٹے قبل

President confers Nishan-e-Pakistan upon King Abdullah II of Jordan
- 17 گھنٹے قبل

Britain announces largest asylum policy overhaul in modern times
- ایک دن قبل

3rd odi: Pakistan defeat Sri Lanka by 6 wickets, sweep ODI series 3–0
- 13 گھنٹے قبل

Voting on no-confidence motion against AJK PM to be held today
- 3 گھنٹے قبل

Is AI being shoved down your throat at work? Here’s how to fight back.
- 5 گھنٹے قبل

Field Marshal warns against bid to impose war, recalls response given in May
- 17 گھنٹے قبل

Two more judges take oath as member of the Federal Constitutional Court
- ایک گھنٹہ قبل

Valve has stopped manufacturing its Index VR headset
- 7 گھنٹے قبل

Punjab govt extends Section 144 across the province for another seven days
- 2 گھنٹے قبل

We tried Valve’s new VR headset, PC, and controller — ask us anything!
- 7 گھنٹے قبل




