The application states Khan should be disqualified under Article 62 (1)(f) of the Constitution


Islamabad: An application was filed with the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for the disqualification of PTI Chairman and former Prime Minister Imran Khan following the verdict in the prohibited funding case.
The application was filed on behalf of Aman Taraqi Party Chairman Faiq Shah who pleaded that the PTI chairman PTI should be disqualified for submitting a "false" affidavit.
According to the text of the petition, Imran Khan should be disqualified under Article 62 (1)(f) of the Cosntitution. PTI leader Faisal Vawda was also disqualified in the similar case.
Faiq requested that Imran Khan be removed from the party chairmanship.
It should be noted that the Election Commission had announced today the preserved decision of the foreign funding case on June 21, in which the prohibited funding to PTI has been proved.
Meanwhile, after the decision of the prohibited funding case, the federal government has also started considering important options.
The federal ministers have started consultation with the constitutional and legal experts.

Ford had to hire back former engineers to fix mistakes made by its automated systems
- 3 hours ago

How much do gold prices lose in value in Pakistan, global markets?
- a day ago

5.9-magnitude earthquake rocks Punjab, Islamabad, parts of KP
- a day ago

The solar-powered Birdbuddy Pro is on sale for $168, the lowest price yet
- 3 hours ago

Trump wants the US military to be rent-a-cops
- a day ago

MSMEs take centre stage in govt’s economic vision, says SAPM Haroon Akhtar Khan
- 20 hours ago

21 Prime Day deals Verge readers are buying right now
- 12 hours ago
Iran says it struck US-linked targets in response to US attacks
- a day ago

Bob Iger’s Disney wanted Apple, Twitter, and 007
- 12 hours ago
Belgium into World Cup last 32 with New Zealand rout
- a day ago

PM Shehbaz vows to pursue peace, dialogue and diplomacy for settlement of disputes
- a day ago

The Supreme Court’s embarrassing new Second Amendment decision, explained
- a day ago










