According to the details, a nine-member bench chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa heard the case.


Islamabad: Former prime minister and Pakistan Peoples party’s (PPP) founder Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s presidential reference case hearing has begun in Supreme Court (SC).
According to the details, a nine-member bench chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa heard the case.
CJP stated that if you want to say something opposite of your party then tell the court.
Former attorney general Khalid Javed Khan said that he presented some objects in written form. This case trial has not run with transparency. This case trial cannot be reopened in SC yet the court can say that this case has not run in transparent form.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked that SC cannot go into Bhutto case’s merits.
Qazi Faez directed that the court is restricted to express the opinion on presidential reference.
Former attorney replied that apart from the political purposes court is restricted to express the opinion on other matters.
Justice Mansoor affirmed that in Bhutto case the court can only oversee that if the trial was fair or not.
Lawyer Khalid Javed responded that the court also must see that the whole state’s machinery was in the control of ruler Zia ul Haq at that time. He mentioned the Lahore High Court (LHC) judge who stated that Bhutto was not a good Muslim.
He inquired that what is the point of LHC's judge that he talked about Bhutto of being a good Muslim or not. The SC did not say anything regarding this.
CJP questioned that had LHC's judge said such thing. The lawyer answered that SC's written verdict is also present in this regard in which LHC's judge observation has been mentioned.
Qazi Isa remarked that the Bhutto case is the only one case in the history which has a military verdict consisted of 935 pages. If this much long verdict has been written in history then tell the court.
Justice Mandokhail said that look like this detailed decision was written amid the disagreement on the verdict.
Justice Mansoor inquied that how can the SC review this case. On this Faez Isa said that SC can over view on any court's verdict.
Justice Mansoor said that the transparency of the trial can be seen in the Bhutto case, but the procedure should be told, how should the Supreme Court reopen the trial of a criminal case in a presidential reference.
Judicial Assistant Khalid Javed Khan said that judges were not independent during martial law.
Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan said that the constitution was abolished during martial law.
PPP leader Raza Rabbani said that when Justice Waheeduddin fell ill, the matter was kept in the court, at that time an ad hoc judge joined the nine-member bench, Qaiser Khan was the ad hoc judge in this case.

Abhishek Bachchan first time wins Best Actor Filmfare Award in 25-year career
- 19 hours ago

Punjab govt's important decision regarding toll plazas for public convenience
- 20 hours ago

Can America recover from Trump? Here’s what new data says.
- 18 hours ago

Donald Trump announces to start second phase of Gaza peace deal
- an hour ago

Once a club on the rise, Liverpool in desperate need of a spark under Gareth Taylor
- 17 hours ago

Google to invest $15bn in India
- 20 hours ago

Azad Kashmir Information Minister Mazhar Saeed resigns
- 19 hours ago

Establishing Palestine with pre-1967 borders is bedrock of Pakistan's Middle East policy: PM
- 20 hours ago

Here’s how Apple is locking down iPhones to comply with Texas’ age verification law
- 20 hours ago

You can still snag LG’s C4 OLED TV at half the price
- 20 hours ago

Fourth day of 1st Test: South Africa's batting continues in second innings
- a few seconds ago

Gen-Z overthrows govt in Madagascar, president flee, parliament dissolves
- 2 hours ago