Meta says it’s offered to reduce the price of its ad-free subscription for Instagram and Facebook in Europe to address regulatory concerns, Reuters reports. Speaking in a hearing with the European Commission, Meta lawyer Tim Lamb said the company has “offered to drop the price from €9.99 to €5.99 for a single account and €4 for any additional accounts” in its discussion with privacy regulators in an attempt to “get to a steady state.”
- Home
- Technology
- News
Ad-free Facebook might get way cheaper to appease EU regulators
Meta has offered to almost halve the amount it charges for ad-free access to Instagram and Facebook in Europe, from €9.99 to €5.99 for a single account.


Lamb said €5.99 is “by far the lowest end of the range that any reasonable person should be paying for services of this quality” and hoped that the “regulatory uncertainty” will “settle down quickly.” It reportedly made the offer to cut its prices to data protection authorities earlier this year.
The company launched its ad-free subscription last November after European Union regulators challenged the legal basis for its collection and processing of user data. Meta hoped that this “Subscription for no ads” program would allow it to effectively get consent to process user data under the EU’s GDPR rules as well as the Digital Markets Act. The subscription is available in the European Economic Area and Switzerland.
But the paid tier was quickly the subject of complaints from consumer groups, who’ve attacked the measure as a “pay-or-consent” smokescreen. “Meta’s offer to consumers is smoke and mirrors to cover up what is, at its core, the same old hoovering up of all kinds of sensitive information about people’s lives which it then monetises through its invasive advertising model,” the European Consumer Organisation’s (BEUC) deputy director general, Ursula Pachl, said in a statement in February.
Eight consumer groups from the BEUC’s network filed complaints with their respective national data protection authorities accusing Meta of not complying with the GDPR. The group said Meta doesn’t have a “valid legal basis” to justify its data collection and that “the choice it imposes on its users can not lead to their freely given and informed consent.”
It’s unclear whether simply lowering the price of this monthly subscription will address these privacy concerns. Although privacy rights group NOYB attacked the cost of the subscription for being “way out of proportion” to the value Meta gets from tracking EU users, other groups have more structural complaints with the way the subscription has been implemented. BEUC, which serves as an umbrella group of 45 consumer organizations, has called for Meta to give consumers more time to think about their choice, for example, and to be more transparent about which data is collected under the paid option.

President felicitates Nizar Amidi on election as President of Iraq
- 8 hours ago

The real reason your monthly gas bill keeps going up
- 19 hours ago

How fan fiction went mainstream
- 19 hours ago

My go-to electric screwdriver is on sale for over 50 percent off today
- 12 hours ago
Barça complain to UEFA after pen denied vs. Atleti
- 20 hours ago
Auburn, Texas A&M to host Argentina before WC
- 20 hours ago
Porto howler gifts Forest hope after UEL first leg
- 20 hours ago

Pakistan played constructive role in peace talks with Iran: US Vice President
- 12 hours ago

Iranian delegation departs to Tehran after participating in Islamabad Talks
- 5 hours ago

Fubo’s mobile app is pushing more sports highlights
- 12 hours ago

Did the Trump administration threaten the pope?
- 19 hours ago

Pakistan to continue facilitating dialogue between Iran and the US: Ishaq Dar
- 12 hours ago










