The ICJ also took issue with the manner in which the amendment was passed


Geneva: The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) has strongly criticized the swift passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, calling it a severe blow to judicial independence and the rule of law.
The amendment, which was approved by both houses of parliament, introduces significant changes to the judiciary's functioning, including the reduction of the Supreme Court’s suo motu powers and limiting the chief justice of Pakistan’s (CJP) term to three years.
Key provisions of the amendment empower the prime minister to select the CJP from among the three most senior Supreme Court judges. The ICJ voiced its concerns, emphasizing that these changes severely compromise judicial independence.
In his statement, ICJ Secretary General Santiago Canton condemned the amendment, saying it introduces an "extraordinary level of political influence" over the judicial appointment process and the judiciary's administration. He warned that these reforms weaken the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on other branches of the state and to protect human rights.
The ICJ also took issue with the manner in which the amendment was passed, noting the lack of public consultation and the speed at which the bill was turned into law. "It is alarming that a constitutional amendment of such significance was pushed through in less than 24 hours, without public engagement," said Canton.
The amendment's changes to the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) were also criticized. The ICJ warned that these modifications could lead to increased political influence over the JCP, undermining its independence.
Additionally, it expressed concerns about the lack of clear criteria for appointing the CJP and the removal of inefficient judges, stating that the absence of defined standards opens the door to political manipulation.
While acknowledging that judicial reforms may be necessary to improve efficiency and accountability, the ICJ concluded that the 26th Amendment represents an effort to bring the judiciary under executive control, violating key principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers.

Tremors jolt Islamabad, Peshawar and other cities
- 10 hours ago
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Rawalpindi police arrest man for molesting minor girls at shop
- 10 hours ago

Amazon’s Lens Live AI shops for anything you can see
- 3 hours ago

You can charge your Apple Watch, phone, and laptop all at once with this 240W USB-C cable
- 3 hours ago

Backyard Football '99 re-release date announced for PC and mobile
- 2 hours ago

The right debates just how weird their authoritarianism should be
- an hour ago

Why 3-year-olds need smartphones*
- an hour ago

The US strike on a Venezuelan drug boat, briefly explained
- an hour ago

Chatbots can be manipulated through flattery and peer pressure
- 3 hours ago

Why kids are all posing like this in pictures
- an hour ago

The one-sided intimacy of being a fan
- an hour ago

Trump is moving Space Command to Alabama
- 3 hours ago