Petition requested that Practice and Procedure Amendment Act be suspended, pending decision on petition


Islamabad: The Practice and Procedure Amendment Ordinance 2024 has been challenged in the Supreme Court.
In the Supreme Court, Chaudhry Ehtisham-ul-Haq Advocate filed a petition in which it has been requested that the amendment ordinance should be declared unconstitutional and all the measures taken under it should be declared null and void.
It has been stated in the petition that the issuance of the ordinance is against parliamentary democracy. The Supreme Court has also declared that the ordinance can be issued only in emergencies.
It was requested on behalf of the petitioner that the Practice and Procedure Amendment Ordinance be suspended, pending the decision on the petition.
Earlier, an application has also been filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC) against the Practice and Procedure Amendment Ordinance.
It is pertinent to note that the Supreme Court Amendment Practice and Procedure Ordinance 2024 came into force after the signature of President Asif Zardari on September 20.
Earlier, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the federal cabinet approved the Supreme Court Amendment Practice and Procedure Act.
In this regard, Minister of Information and Broadcasting Attaullah Tarar said that the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Amendment Ordinance was implemented to promote the public interest and the transparency of the judicial process.
What is the Practice and Procedure Ordinance?
According to the Ordinance, the bench will hear cases keeping in view the public importance and fundamental human rights, each case will be heard in its turn or the reason will be shown.
The amending Ordinance stated that every case and appeal shall be recorded and a transcript prepared which shall be made available to the public.
The Practice and Procedure Act Committee will decide the cases. The committee will consist of the Chief Justice, the most senior judge and the judge nominated by the Chief Justice.
The Ordinance included an amendment to Section III of the Practice and Procedure Act. Sections 7A and 7B have been added to the Practice and Procedure Act.
The Ordinance provided that public interest reasons must be given before hearing, under Section 7A. Cases which are filed first will be heard first, if a bench hears a case against its turn, reasons must be given.

Root takes charge, guiding England to series whitewash over Pakistan
- 7 hours ago

Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s death anniversary observed
- a day ago
AI-assisted documentary tests cinema's boundaries at Venice Film Festival
- a day ago

Ashrafi receives ‘The Hubert Walter Award for Reconciliation and Interfaith Cooperation 2026’
- 10 hours ago

Gaza film, Malkovich drama vie for Venice top prize
- 9 hours ago

The Supreme Court just handed Republicans a surprisingly decisive midterm loss
- 18 hours ago

How the iPhone Duo compares to other folding phones
- 20 hours ago

The one problem Trump can’t afford
- 18 hours ago

Pakistan condemns drone attacks on KSA’s East-West Pipeline
- 9 hours ago
New York marks 25th anniversary of 9/11 attacks
- a day ago

CJP emphasises district judiciary’s role in building public confidence
- 10 hours ago

Australia Mosque in Lahore marks 100 years of Australia–Pakistan connections
- a day ago










