Connect with us

Pakistan

Self deception!

Written

on

Prime Minister Imran Khan revealed in an interview with a Turkish TV that his government was holding talks in Afghanistan with some groups of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan. There are different groups that make up TTP. Yes, we are talking to some of them.

Imran Yaqub Khan Profile Imran Yaqub Khan

To a question if the Afghan Taliban are also helping you (Pakistan) in this regard? The prime minister said that since the talks were taking place in Afghanistan, They (the Afghan Taliban) are helping only to that extent. If the TTP groups that are in talks surrender, they will be forgiven and can live like ordinary citizens. When asked, "Do you expect any kind of agreement?" the premier said: "I want to say again that I do not believe in a military solution, as a politician I believe in dialogue". The host asked why Pakistani security forces are being targeted if talks are ongoing. On this, Imran Khan said, "We are negotiating. It was a fresh wave of attacks and we may not reach an agreement in the end, but we are negotiating."

Earlier, President Arif Alai and other key government officials were seen offering amnesty, but the prime minister announced the start of talks on Turkish TV. A group that martyred more than 80,000 Pakistanis, maimed thousands for life, left thousands of children orphaned and helpless, mothers abandoned and brides bereaved. Negotiations with this group and who formulated the policy of amnesty for them and where? Why was the people's representative forum Parliament excluded from this process? Those whom we called martyrs and have been composing songs in their memory for years. Can their blood be forgiven? A prime minister who used to call his predecessors Mughal emperors to ridicule dictatorship, has he now become the emperor himself?

Of course, no government official will have the answers to all these questions and he would not like to face such questions, so the decisions were made in closed-door meetings, the policy was made and the process began. But it is important to remind them that the state has already made similar efforts to bring murderers and terrorists into the national mainstream by declaring them as lost people.

When former Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif took over as the Prime Minister, he wanted to carry out this mission in good faith despite the acts of terrorism. He also formed a committee for negotiations which included Irfan Siddiqui, Rahimullah Yousafzai, Rustam Shah Mohmand and others. Now Imran Khan is the Prime Minister of Pakistan and being the chief executive of this country he has to take concrete steps and final decisions to ensure the safety of the lives and property of the people.

It is up to the Prime Minister to decide whether to respond to the enemies of peace with bullets or to bring them into the national mainstream by negotiating with them. It would be better if all the stakeholders were involved in this process. Whether it is America's 20-year war on terror in Afghanistan or the fight against the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), whether Imran Khan is in opposition or in government, he has always said that war is a problem and not the solution. Some of his critics have been calling him "Taliban Khan" for such things.

The PPP has strongly reacted to the Prime Minister's statement of talks with some TTP groups and demanded that a session of Parliament be convened. Sherry Rehman says: The confirmation of negotiations with the TTP is shocking and disturbing. Who are you to forgive TTP alone? The TTP has announced that it will not apologize, the government should explain the statement of the Prime Minister in Parliament. PML-N Senator Irfan Siddiqui has said that it is not appropriate to keep the government talks with the TTP secret. This is a sensitive national issue. In the Nawaz era, the talks were approved by the parliament. Negotiations with the TTP and the offer of a general amnesty without taking the nation and parliament into confidence have raised many questions.

In my opinion, the demand of the opposition is legitimate. They should have been taken into confidence on such an important and sensitive issue. If they were not taken into confidence, then it should be explained why the talks started at once. When and where was the decision made to pardon those who surrendered and allow them to live like ordinary citizens?

Federal Minister for Information Fawad Chaudhry gave some explanation on this. In a video statement, he said the state of Pakistan has gone through a river of fire and blood, we have sacrificed thousands of people, now we need to move forward. The policies of the state are formed in a specific background. Many people who have not been able to fulfill their pledge of allegiance to Pakistan want to return to fulfill this pledge. There are various groups in the banned TTP, including those who want to fulfill their pledge of allegiance to Pakistan. Those who to move forward by abiding by the constitution, we believe that such people should be given a chance by the state to return to the mainstream of life.

Nawaz Sharif also considered the people involved in the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban in his time as angry and misguided. That is why he wanted to find a way to peace through negotiations but then the tragedy of APS happened which changed everything. At that time, the state had to make tough decisions. Now that Fawad Chaudhry is referring to the new state policy in a new context, it is hoped that key stakeholders will be taken into confidence on this new policy, otherwise decisions taken in an atmosphere of mistrust may be reversed in the future. The banned Tehreek-e-Taliban and the people influenced by its ideology are a reality of our society which is very bitter.

It is important to acknowledge that extremism has become part of our society. Not all extremists can be bombed, nor can all be crucified. To deal with extremism, fundamental changes must be made in the state structure. Why is there extremism in society? The answer to this question must first be found. To change thinking, you have to change the environment, you have to teach yourself and the children of the enemy, but you have to decide what to teach.

Continue Reading

Crime

Pakistani trader sends soil to Chinese company for Rs115mn instead of minerals

Danzo Traders sent containers filled with soil, gravel, and stones instead of precious metal chrome ore

Published by Noor Fatima

Published

on

Karachi: The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA)’s Cooperative Crime Circle has arrested a businessman and registered a case on charges of sending 60 containers of soil and gravel to a Chinese company for Rs115 million instead of precious minerals.

According to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) officials, a case has been registered against Syed Zeeshan Afzal Bilgrami, owner of M/s Danzo Traders, in the Corporate Crime Circle Karachi and he has been arrested.

The FIR was registered following a criminal inquiry that was initiated on a complaint by Ms Corrine Chen of a Chinese importing company.

According to the case, the accused Syed Zeeshan Afzal Bilgrami, and the Chinese importer Jiangsu Provincial Foreign Trade Corporation signed an agreement on January 17, 2024, under which Danzo Traders Karachi was to export 1,500 metric tons of chrome ore to the said Chinese company in China.

On February 11, Danzo Traders sent a shipment of containers from Karachi port to Xingang port in China, which were filled with soil, gravel, and stones instead of precious metal chrome ore.

According to the case, even before the said shipment reached China, accused Syed Zeeshan Afzal fraudulently executed the said LC held in his company’s bank account, and submitted fake and bogus documents for inspection certificate of quality and VAT deposit in the bank.

According to the FIA, accused Syed Zeeshan not only committed export fraud, but also committed banking fraud by submitting fake, fabricated, and bogus documents for the execution of LC in his favor. The accused not only cheated the Chinese importer but also defamed the name of the nation and the country.

The authorities stated that accused Zeeshan has also been arrested from his office located on II Chandigarh Road.

It is pertinent to note that chrome ore is a natural mineral that contains chromium, iron, and oxygen and is used to make ferrochrome, an important ingredient in stainless steel.

Continue Reading

Regional

The least thoughtful holiday present you should definitely give

CiCi Zhang believes the best gift money can buy is, well, money itself. As a kid, her father attempted to buy her presents, but he so often missed the mark that he transitioned to giving her money by the time she was a teen, Zhang, 30, says.  At the start of …

Published by Web Desk

Published

on

CiCi Zhang believes the best gift money can buy is, well, money itself. As a kid, her father attempted to buy her presents, but he so often missed the mark that he transitioned to giving her money by the time she was a teen, Zhang, 30, says. At the start of their relationship, her husband wasn’t much better, either. A few of his greatest gift misses included a massage gun and a food scale. They couldn’t return the massage gun, Zhang says, so she kept it. As for the scale, the couple took it back and shopped for a replacement together. Despite his gifting shortcomings, Zhang’s husband refuses to give money as a gift, she says. As a compromise, she maintains a comprehensive wish list from which he can select items that are sure to please. Zhang grew up in China, where giving monetary gifts during holidays and special events is customary. “During Father’s Day, I probably will give my dad money,” says Zhang, who is now based outside of Seattle. “With money, it’s guaranteed that you can use it. Probably you want it, you can spend it, or you can save it.” Despite the fact that giving cash as a present is not only normative but preferred in other countries like Korea and Japan, in the US and other Western cultures, the exchange is sometimes seen as gauche. Cash is easy, quick, and, most of all, practical since almost everyone could use a little more of it. But for those same reasons, money can be seen as thoughtless, or worse, an implication the gift recipient really, really needs it — more than the candle warmer or the novelty socks you picked out in a panic on Christmas Eve. After all, who wants to put a dollar amount on a priceless relationship? But if you were to ask recipients what they actually want for the holidays, the answer is clear: Cash is king. A December 2023 YouGov survey found 38 percent of global respondents said they’d prefer to get cash for the holidays — the largest share of potential presents. Another 10 percent said they wanted gift cards. The MassMutual Consumer Spending & Saving Index from 2022 found similar results: 31 percent of Americans said their ideal gift was cash; 16 percent said their dream present was a gift card. The chasm between what people really want — money — and what givers feel comfortable gifting — pretty much anything else — has led gift-givers to waste millions of dollars on unwanted or lackluster presents. But you shouldn’t feel weird bestowing cash to your nearest and dearest, experts say. There are tactful ways to do it. Americans have never liked giving cash gifts Americans have long been leery of giving money to their loved ones for the holidays. In the 1993 book The Modern Christmas in America: A Cultural History of Gift Giving, William Waits writes that even though some magazines offered advice on how to thoughtfully give money in the early 20th century, the public found the practice “impersonal” and cold. “As a gift item,” Waits wrote, “[money] ascribed a certain numerical value to relationships but did not define the quality of the relationships.” Gift certificates posed the same problem. During that time, rural Americans gifted their friends and family food and small handmade wooden or sewn presents. Those in cities swapped figurines, wall hangings, and other crafts. Throughout the 20th century, however, consumption and consumerism took root in the American psyche. Businesses and department stores began to heavily advertise their products during the holiday season, encouraging shoppers to find the perfect present behind their doors. These days, the holiday shopping season seems to creep earlier and earlier with the goal of getting consumers to spend more and more, often on tangible, unwanted items — a good portion of which end up in the trash. Nearly half of holiday shoppers begin their purchasing as early as August, per a Bankrate survey. This year, Americans each plan to spend over $900 on holiday gifts, up from about $800 last year, according to NerdWallet’s annual holiday spending report. [Image: Despite being considered gauche by Americans, cash is the gift many want most. https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/10/GettyImages-166422697.jpg?quality=90&strip=all] Why giving cash is so uncomfortable While Americans might be spending more on holiday gifts, or at least urged to, they aren’t necessarily choosing presents that are sure to delight the recipient. When shopping, givers often choose an item that says more about themselves than it does the recipient, says Ernest Baskin, an associate professor of food, pharma, and health care at Saint Joseph’s University. Givers are preoccupied with the “wow” factor, research shows, a present that says, “Look how well I know you to have selected this thoughtful, meaningful item.” “Most of the time, we’re not right about this, to be honest,” Baskin says. “Most of the time, [recipients] can tell you very well what their desire is, or they’d rather you just give them money so they can pick what their desire is.” Cash is practical — almost too practical — and givers tend to underestimate how much recipients appreciate useful, ordinary presents, research suggests. Indeed, handing someone a card with a check inside is less exciting than watching their face light up at the sight of a puppy in a box. However, after the initial excitement fades, the pragmatic, boring gift gets the most use. Cash is also seen as thoughtless and low-effort, says Julian Givi, associate professor of marketing at West Virginia University. Writing a check or hitting the ATM requires very little creative energy. “It’s really in no way personalized to you,” Givi says. “[Giving] 100 bucks to someone shows nothing about your knowledge of their hobbies, their interests, their passions, and so on.” The relationship between the giver and the receiver is also paramount in cash-giving scenarios. A grandparent tucking a $5 bill into a card for a kid is kosher, “but going up the age ladder is a little awkward,” Givi says. Think about it: How would Grandma feel if you gave her $25 in cash? Cash gifts between friends is also tricky, says Lizzie Post, etiquette expert and co-president at the Emily Post Institute. That same $5 your aunt gives you every year is odd coming from a friend. There’s the implication that the receiver is in dire straits and perhaps needs the cash more than, say, a cashmere sweater. “We don’t often just hand our friends money,” Post says. “Instead, we go do something enriching with them.” Even if the recipient explicitly requests cash, Americans still find it taboo to comply. Instead, givers have found ways to creatively disguise the act of bestowing money, especially through registries. To make the exchange more thoughtful, wedding or baby shower guests will often contribute to a honeymoon or diaper fund. Platforms like Honeyfund and Babylist have facilitated these touchless cash gifts, eliminating the potential awkwardness of handing over a supposedly inconsiderate present. “At the end of the day, that’s still just cash that you’re giving,” Baskin says, “but now you can say that I’m actually giving something that the couple needs.” Gift cards, too, are simply cash by another name, only restricted to specific stores. Giving cash doesn’t have to be awkward Despite popular convention that cash presents are gauche, tacky, or uninspired, Post says the annals of etiquette wisdom permit monetary gifts. (Though she does find the practice of Venmoing money as a wedding gift a little crass.) The key is to make it thoughtful. Definitely include a card, Post says, and write a short note about how you hope they spend the dough: “Use this to buy those Taylor Swift concert tickets” or “Treat yourself to a massage.” As for the amount, consider your relationship with the recipient, but only give what is within your budget, Post says. Remember how awkward it would be to give Grandma $25? Giving her a gift card to a grocery store is likely to go over better, Givi says, even if the dollar amount is the same. “You’re putting in some thoughtfulness to select something related to her and who she is,” Givi says. “Then also, you had to go out and buy this thing.” If you feel so inclined as to ask for cash, offer the givers a few other options, Post says: “Someone asks you, ‘What do you want for Hanukkah?’ You could absolutely say to them, ‘I’m into these books. I’m into this sport. Anything to do with them is great. And of course, I’m always a fan of cash. Whatever is easiest for you to do.’” Should you still lack gifting inspiration, ask yourself what gift you’d like to receive, Baskin, the Saint Joseph’s researcher, says. Is it embroidered socks or is it cold hard cash? When Baskin poses that same question to study participants, “the answer [that] often comes up,” he says, is “money.”
Continue Reading

Technology

Sony’s new flagship A1 II has trickle-up features from cheaper cameras

The new Sony A1 II is poised to take on other flagship mirrorless cameras like the Canon R1 and Nikon Z9. And it’s releasing alongside a new FE 28-70mm f/2 zoom lens.

Published by Web Desk

Published

on

Sony announced its new A1 II pro-focused mirrorless camera during today’s livestream from its Creative Space event in New York City. The camera has various speed and performance improvements over its predecessor, plus a fast new zoom lens to accompany it.

The $6,499 A1 II sports a 50.1-megapixel full-frame stacked sensor that’s capable of shooting full-resolution RAW photos at 30 frames per second and up to 8K video at 30p (as well as 4K video at 120p). That’s not very different from the original A1, but the sequel model is adopting the body design of Sony’s A9 III with a slightly taller grip and improved ergonomics, an in-body image stabilizer capable of a claimed 8.5 stops of correction, and a speed boost button and pre-capture function (also like the A9 III). It also has both the AI processor for improved autofocus and the vari-angle tilting screen first introduced with the A7R V.

Front view of the Sony A1 II with no lens attachedFront view of the Sony A1 II with no lens attachedPreviousNext

1/6

Image: Sony

It sounds a bit like the speedy A1 body is getting some chip-bump performance improvements, and is also raking in all the quality-of-life benefits of its lower-end and slightly less expensive counterpart models in the Alpha lineup.

In addition, Sony has made a new FE 28-70mm f/2 GM zoom lens to launch alongside the A1 11 in December. Compared to the popular 24-70mm f/2.8 (a staple lens of nearly every camera maker), the new lens sacrifices a little at the wide end in exchange for that faster maximum aperture. Canon has a similar lens in its EOS R line, and using it feels like you’re using a bag full of prime lenses in just one zoom, but Sony’s model weighs in at 2.02 lbs. / 918g — about 1.13 lbs. / 512g lighter than Canon’s. Sony’s lens is also slightly cheaper at $2,899 compared to Canon’s $3,099, but either way, you’re paying a hefty sum for all that versatility.

The Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lensThe Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lensPreviousNext

1/5

Image: Sony

The fact that the A1 II remains a stacked sensor design and hasn’t adopted the global shutter means that the latter type of camera tech remains an outlier with the Sony A9 III. Perhaps the sacrifices to dynamic range and base ISO are not yet worth the trade-off in the A1 II with its much higher resolution.

Since its launch in 2021, the original A1 has been the camera with the least compromises in Sony’s lineup. It’s offered the trifecta of speed, resolution, and video chops all in one, as long as you were willing and able to pay a very high price. The A1 II looks like an extension of that, but its new capabilities seem less like something that will set the photo world afire and more like a modest upgrade. Meanwhile, the sequel model will have stiffer competition than ever, since models from other brands, like the Canon R1 and Nikon Z9, now have pro-level offerings that can better compete.

Comments
Continue Reading

Trending