Turkey on Sunday condemned a judgment by the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice (ECJ) to let companies ban the wearing of headscarves under "certain conditions”.

In a statement, the Turkish Foreign Ministry said the ruling was a sign of growing Islamophobia at a time Muslim women in Europe are being subjected to increasing discrimination for their religious beliefs.

"At a time when Islamophobia, racism, and the poison of hatred, which took Europe hostage, are on the rise, the ECJ's decision not only ignores freedom of religion but also provides a basis and legal cover for discrimination"

According to the international news agency, Ankara further said allowing the banning of headscarves under certain conditions is a "clear violation of religious freedoms."

The ministry added that the current ruling would worsen prejudices against Muslim women in Europe.

"It is a fact that Muslims are exposed to intolerance, hate speech and even violence, are widely stigmatized and excluded in socio-economic fields and especially Muslim women are adversely affected by this situation” the statement read.

On the other hand, the Turkish presidency's communication director Fahrettin Altun also condemned the move, saying "this wrong decision is an attempt to grant legitimacy to racism."

It is unbelievable that fascism just spread to the courts.

This wrong decision is an attempt to grant legitimacy to racism.

Instead of denouncing its dark past, Europe now seeks to embrace it.

We condemn this ruling, which infringes on human dignity. https://t.co/dB68YpdL83

— Fahrettin Altun (@fahrettinaltun) July 17, 2021

The EU court ruling was made on Thursday after cases brought by two Muslim women in Germany who were suspended from their workplaces after they started wearing headscarves at work.

The court ruled that a company could justify its decision to present a neutral image towards customers or prevent social disputes.

The ECJ in response to whether headscarf bans at work represented a violation of the freedom of religion, said such bans were possible if justified by an employer's need to present a neutral image.