Country's decision making to slow down if whole cabinet held accountable for joint actions, CJP observes
The top judge hears the petition of PTI chief Imran Khan against recent amendments to the NAB laws


Islamabad: To hold the entire cabinet or committee responsible for the decisions taken collectively would slow down the country’s decision making process, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial observed Wednesday.
The observation came during the hearing of petition filed by former prime minister Imran Khan’s petition against the recent amendments to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) ordinance.
A three-member bench, comprising the chief justice himself, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ijazul Ahsan, heard PTI lawyer Khwaja Haris’ arguments on Imran’s plea, which claims the new NAB laws “are a violation of fundamental rights”.
Haris, at the beginning of the hearing, pointed out as part of NAB amendments, the decision of the federal cabinet and working development parties had been excluded from the jurisdiction of accountability watchdog.
“The new laws are also a violation of the international conventions of anti-corruption,” he maintained.
Justice Bandial remarked that important decisions in the country are taken jointly by the federal cabinet and committees, and if all its members were to be deemed accused, “who would take the decisions then?”
“If the parliament starts doing everything, the decision-making process will slow down,” he said.
The CJP questioned the history of NAB law’s application, recalling that cases pertaining to LNG (liquified natural gas) contracts were lodged without proper examination of the facts. “Such contracts are prepared on the government level.”
The top judge said several bureaucrats were made to serve jail time only to be later acquitted in the reference, adding that “sometimes things are not under the control of the bureaucracy”.
Commenting over cases involving assets beyond means, he said such cases were considered a crime across the world. “We will review the NAB amendments in the context of international standards and local laws,” Justice Bandial observed.
Justice Shah inquired if those who managed to come out scot-free from the NAB laws could be punished under any other law.
The PTI lawyer replied that there is no other law for misuse of power, saying after the new amendments, it had become impossible to prove corruption of more than Rs500 million.

Why free speech can be so contentious
- 5 منٹ قبل

Wrestlepalooza 2025: Date, time, channel, card, how to watch
- ایک گھنٹہ قبل
First ODI: Sidra Ameen’s ton helps Pakistan women set South Africa 256-run target
- 9 گھنٹے قبل
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Twelve killed in Malaysia landslides after week-long downpour
- 7 گھنٹے قبل

The Supreme Court is about to decide one of the biggest economic policy cases ever
- 5 منٹ قبل

Microsoft avoids EU fine after Slack complained about Teams bundling
- 2 گھنٹے قبل

Nintendo Direct September 2025: all the news and trailers
- 2 گھنٹے قبل

You can now play Silksong on flagship Android phones — and pick up where you left off on PC
- 2 گھنٹے قبل
Asia Cup T20: Bangladesh defeat Afghanistan by 8 runs
- 7 گھنٹے قبل

Roku wants you to see a lot more AI-generated ads
- 2 گھنٹے قبل

Sierra CEO Bret Taylor on why the AI bubble feels like the dotcom boom
- 2 گھنٹے قبل

Amazon’s Thursday Night Football broadcasts add more AI to the NFL
- 2 گھنٹے قبل