Turkey on Sunday condemned a judgment by the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice (ECJ) to let companies ban the wearing of headscarves under "certain conditions”.
In a statement, the Turkish Foreign Ministry said the ruling was a sign of growing Islamophobia at a time Muslim women in Europe are being subjected to increasing discrimination for their religious beliefs.
"At a time when Islamophobia, racism, and the poison of hatred, which took Europe hostage, are on the rise, the ECJ's decision not only ignores freedom of religion but also provides a basis and legal cover for discrimination"
According to the international news agency, Ankara further said allowing the banning of headscarves under certain conditions is a "clear violation of religious freedoms."
The ministry added that the current ruling would worsen prejudices against Muslim women in Europe.
"It is a fact that Muslims are exposed to intolerance, hate speech and even violence, are widely stigmatized and excluded in socio-economic fields and especially Muslim women are adversely affected by this situation” the statement read.
On the other hand, the Turkish presidency's communication director Fahrettin Altun also condemned the move, saying "this wrong decision is an attempt to grant legitimacy to racism."
It is unbelievable that fascism just spread to the courts.
— Fahrettin Altun (@fahrettinaltun) July 17, 2021
This wrong decision is an attempt to grant legitimacy to racism.
Instead of denouncing its dark past, Europe now seeks to embrace it.
We condemn this ruling, which infringes on human dignity. https://t.co/dB68YpdL83
The EU court ruling was made on Thursday after cases brought by two Muslim women in Germany who were suspended from their workplaces after they started wearing headscarves at work.
The court ruled that a company could justify its decision to present a neutral image towards customers or prevent social disputes.
The ECJ in response to whether headscarf bans at work represented a violation of the freedom of religion, said such bans were possible if justified by an employer's need to present a neutral image.
PM reaffirms unwavering support for OIC's shared goals
- 8 hours ago
Five terrorists killed in D I Khan IBO: ISPR
- 10 hours ago
D-Chowk protest: Court approves bail of 153 PTI activists
- 13 hours ago
Cavs outduel Thunder in battle of NBA's top teams
- 15 hours ago
‘Real-world harm’ if Meta ends fact checks, global network warns
- 10 hours ago
Have the past 10 years of Democratic politics been a disaster?
- an hour ago
Donald Trump spared jail at hush money sentencing, days before inauguration
- 8 hours ago
Ravens rule out Pro Bowl WR Flowers vs. Steelers
- 2 hours ago
An explosive Fox Sports lawsuit has turned into a salacious, sexist mess
- an hour ago
Sources: Former Boise St. QB Nelson joins UTEP
- 2 hours ago
California overhauled its insurance system. Then Los Angeles caught fire.
- an hour ago
Muhammad Asif bags third SAARC Snooker Championship
- 10 hours ago